aBased on a real-world study with 354 people with hemophilia A. Analysis is limited to ABRs in medical records and PROs from the survey and may have been limited by medical record discrepancies, recall bias, and potential reporting bias for bleeds.1
ABR=annual bleed rate; PROs= patient-reported outcomes.
Luke lives with Hemophilia A
aBased on a real-world study with 472 people with Hemophilia. Analysis is limited to ABRs in medical records and PROs from the survey and may be limited by medical record discrepancies, recall bias, and potential reporting bias for bleeds.1
In a real-world study in Israel of 70 patients with severe hemophilia A3
~50%
(N=70)
In a real-world study with 62 physician responses1
42%
(N=40)
AND
50%
(N=28)
According to physicians reporting ABR data from medical records of a subset of patients who had bleed data for ≥1 year. The study was limited to patients seeking hemophilia care, with potential bias toward those with severe illness or higher health care interaction. Additionally, the cross-sectional design may limit changes over time.1
aData from a real-world observational study including patients with severe HA or HAwI, treated at the Israeli National Hemophilia Center, who had received FVIII mimetic therapy for at least 18 months, and experienced at least 1 spontaneous bleed.
bThe objective of this study was to use the Adelphi Real World (ARW) hemophilia Disease Specific Programme (DSP)™ to gain insights into the real-world characteristics and unmet needs of patients with hemophilia A and B within the current treatment landscape in the United States. From July 2023 to February 2024, 62 physicians who treat and manage patients with hemophilia were identified by ARW through local fieldwork partners. Both the recruited physicians and their patients subsequently completed the survey, which included data from 423 patients (348 with hemophilia A and 75 with hemophilia B). The comprehensive observational survey utilized online physician surveys and self-completion questionnaires for patients and caregivers, employing validated instruments such as EQ-5D-5L, WPAI, Haemo-QoL, and joint health assessment tools (e.g., FISH, HJHS).1
In a real-world, 2-year study of 354 patients with hemophilia A1
Patients reported more bleeds in a survey than were recorded in their medical records1
This discrepancy may mean patients are not reporting all bleeds, warranting the need for deeper discussions1,4
Analysis was limited to ABRs in medical records and PROs from the survey and may be limited by medical record discrepancies, recall bias, and potential reporting bias for bleeds.1
Bentlee lives with hemophilia A (and mom Teilei)
A target joint in this study was defined as a joint with known chronic synovitis, with study investigators given discretion to apply additional criteria.5 The World Federation of Hemophilia defines a target joint as a single joint where 3 or more spontaneous bleeds have occurred within a consecutive 6-month period.4
NEARLY
60%
of patients had
target joints5
According to real-world data from the CHESS study of 949 adults with hemophilia A. Patient data were collected retrospectively between January and April 2015.5
Joint bleeds Still cause4,6,7:
REDUCED MOBILITY
CHRONIC PAIN
TARGET JOINTS
JOINT COMORBIDITIES
Reduced physical activity can lead to weight gain, which may then lead to an increased load on joints. That load can then be followed by further bleeds and mobility problems.8
In a real-world observational study of 354 patients with hemophilia A1,2
33%
(N=75)
On FVIII
MIMETIC
47%
(N=83)
ON FVIII
PROPHYLAXIS
Response to survey question: “Because of taking your current treatment, how often do you feel anxious that your current treatment might not be adequately protecting you from bleeding?” Response options were “Never,” “Rarely,” “Sometimes,” “Often,” and “Always".1
Survey responses were collected in a cross-sectional study design. Responses in individuals over time may vary and may not account for continuous patient participation.
Data from an observational study including 354 patients with hemophilia A, conducted from 2022 to 2023, were collected through online surveys as part of the PicnicHealth research platform. Patients responded to supplemental questions assessing anxiety about bleed protection using a 5-point scale: never, rarely, sometimes, often, or always. Limitations may include selection bias due to the cross-sectional study design, variability in individual responses over time and does not account for continuous patient participation.
Nikola lives with hemophilia A
In a real-world study of 348 patients with hemophilia A1
29%
(N=77)
On FVIII
MIMETIC
18%
(N=103)
ON EHL
PROPHYLAXIS
Response to survey question: “What actions do you take to reduce the overall rate of bleeding episodes.” The study was limited to patients seeking hemophilia care, with potential bias toward those with severe illness or higher health care interaction. Additionally, the cross-sectional design limited the ability to track changes over time.1
The objective of this study was to use the Adelphi Real World (ARW) hemophilia Disease Specific Programme (DSP)™ to gain insights into the real-world characteristics and unmet needs of patients with hemophilia A and B within the current treatment landscape in the United States. From July 2023 to February 2024, 62 physicians who treat and manage patients with hemophilia were identified by ARW through local fieldwork partners. Both the recruited physicians and their patients subsequently completed the survey, which included data from 423 patients (348 with hemophilia A and 75 with hemophilia B). The comprehensive observational survey utilized online physician surveys and self-completion questionnaires for patients and caregivers, employing validated instruments such as EQ-5D-5L, WPAI, Haemo-QoL, and joint health assessment tools (eg, FISH, HJHS).
Luke lives with hemophilia A
References
ABR=annualized bleeding rate; CHESS=Cost of Haemophilia in Europe: a Socioeconomic Survey; EHL=extended half-life; FVIII=Factor VIII; SHL=standard half-life.